본문 바로가기
읽기 · 학술 · 공공저작물 원문

Labor market risks of a magnitude 7.2 earthquake in the San Francisco Bay area: an update and extension

Nicholas Chung · 2025

샌프란시스코만 지역에 규모 7.2의 지진이 나면 사업체와 노동자, 임금이 얼마나 영향을 받을지를 어림한 글입니다. 미국 지질조사국이 예측한 흔들림의 세기와 사업체의 위치 자료를 맞대어, 헤이워드 단층과 샌앤드레이어스 단층에서 지진이 나는 두 경우를 견줍니다. 이 지역의 노동자 수는 2014년보다 8.9퍼센트 늘었습니다. 샌프란시스코반도를 지나는 샌앤드레이어스 단층의 지진은 헤이워드 단층의 지진보다 경제 피해가 더 클 수 있다고 봅니다.

출처 Chung (2025), Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2025 · 미국 정부 공공저작물 · 원문

장 7개 올림 이 장 458낱말
← 앞 장 다음 장 →

이 장은 원문만 있습니다. 문장별 해석은 앞 장부터 차례로 붙입니다.

3장 · The earthquake scenarios: Hayward and San Andreas

The Hayward Fault runs directly through the heavily populated Alameda, Contra Costa, and Santa Clara counties. These three counties, and nearby San Francisco County, are the four most exposed counties in the region, in terms of potential damage, from earthquakes occurring on the Hayward Fault. The fault underlies a populous urban area, principally in Alameda County, and extends 74 miles along the eastern San Francisco Bay. Five other counties—Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Solano, and Sonoma—are further from the Hayward Fault but would still suffer some damage from an earthquake originating from the Hayward Fault. Combined, the 9 counties cover a 7,200 square-mile area and contain 6 million inhabitants, 320,000 business establishments, and 3.6 million jobs. As reported in a previous article, the Hayward Fault is known to generate a damaging earthquake every 150 years. The last event, which occurred in 1868, is now known as the “Hayward Earthquake.”

The magnitude 7.2 earthquake scenario used in this analysis is a more powerful hypothetical natural disaster scenario than the magnitude 6.9 event analyzed in the 2007 BLS article and the magnitude 6.8 event explored in the 2016 BLS article. While a nominal increase of 0.3 or 0.4 magnitude may not seem large, such a slight increase represents roughly double the geographic area of a magnitude 6.9 earthquake, with 2.8 times the strength. Thus, care should be taken when comparing nominal values from this analysis to previous articles, especially if one does not consider natural population growth, consequent employment growth, and inflation. In addition, the wide difference in strengths from slight changes in magnitude should warn readers that earthquakes at a magnitude of 7.2 do not cause uniform damage across the affected areas. In other words, the actual losses of a Hayward Fault earthquake may be less, or greater, than the estimates in this scenario. Still, while the Hayward Fault presents the clearest threat, it is not the only potential source of an earthquake.

In addition to the Hayward Fault, multiple fault lines, including the San Andreas Fault, the Calaveras Fault, and the San Gregorio Fault, run through or are adjacent to the bay area. An earthquake originating from any of these fault lines could also cause significant economic losses. Figure 1 showcases the geographical location and the respective probabilities that each of these fault lines could be an earthquake originator.

Of the multiple fault lines shown above, the most noteworthy is the San Andreas Fault line. While the San Andreas Fault line only has the third-highest probability of being the source of an earthquake, it runs through the San Francisco Peninsula rather than through the East Bay.

Would an earthquake along the San Andreas Fault line have more severe consequences than one originating from the Hayward Fault line? This article analyzes and compares potential economic damage for earthquakes originating from the Hayward and San Andreas Fault lines.

이 글은 미국 정부 공공저작물인 위 출처의 원문을 옮겼습니다. 참고문헌 목록과 인용 번호, 그림 · 표 · 각주 · 수식 · 부록은 빼고 절별로 나누어 실었으며, 그 밖의 문장은 원문 그대로입니다. 원 저작자와 발행 기관은 이 화면을 만들거나 검토하지 않았고, 이곳의 해석과 낱말 풀이는 공식 번역이 아닙니다.
No protection is claimed in original U.S. Government works.