본문 바로가기
읽기 · 학술 · 공개 라이선스 원문

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

John Jumper et al. · 2021

아미노산 서열만 보고 단백질의 3차원 구조를 원자 수준까지 맞히는 인공지능 알파폴드(AlphaFold)를 소개한 논문입니다. 50년 넘게 풀리지 않던 단백질 구조 예측 문제에서 실험으로 구한 구조에 견줄 만한 정확도를 보였습니다. 이 연구를 이끈 데미스 허사비스와 존 점퍼는 2024년 노벨 화학상을 받았습니다.

출처 Jumper et al. (2021), Nature, 596, 583–589 · 라이선스 CC BY 4.0 · 원문

장 10개 올림 이 장 378낱말
← 앞 장 다음 장 →

이 장은 원문만 있습니다. 문장별 해석은 앞 장부터 차례로 붙입니다.

8장 · MSA depth and cross-chain contacts

Although AlphaFold has a high accuracy across the vast majority of deposited PDB structures, we note that there are still factors that affect accuracy or limit the applicability of the model. The model uses MSAs and the accuracy decreases substantially when the median alignment depth is less than around 30 sequences (see Fig. 5a for details). We observe a threshold effect where improvements in MSA depth over around 100 sequences lead to small gains. We hypothesize that the MSA information is needed to coarsely find the correct structure within the early stages of the network, but refinement of that prediction into a high-accuracy model does not depend crucially on the MSA information. The other substantial limitation that we have observed is that AlphaFold is much weaker for proteins that have few intra-chain or homotypic contacts compared to the number of heterotypic contacts (further details are provided in a companion paper). This typically occurs for bridging domains within larger complexes in which the shape of the protein is created almost entirely by interactions with other chains in the complex. Conversely, AlphaFold is often able to give high-accuracy predictions for homomers, even when the chains are substantially intertwined (Fig. 5b). We expect that the ideas of AlphaFold are readily applicable to predicting full hetero-complexes in a future system and that this will remove the difficulty with protein chains that have a large number of hetero-contacts.

Related work

The prediction of protein structures has had a long and varied development, which is extensively covered in a number of reviews. Despite the long history of applying neural networks to structure prediction, they have only recently come to improve structure prediction. These approaches effectively leverage the rapid improvement in computer vision systems by treating the problem of protein structure prediction as converting an ‘image’ of evolutionary couplings to an ‘image’ of the protein distance matrix and then integrating the distance predictions into a heuristic system that produces the final 3D coordinate prediction. A few recent studies have been developed to predict the 3D coordinates directly, but the accuracy of these approaches does not match traditional, hand-crafted structure prediction pipelines. In parallel, the success of attention-based networks for language processing and, more recently, computer vision has inspired the exploration of attention-based methods for interpreting protein sequences.

이 글은 위 출처의 원문을 그 라이선스(CC BY 4.0)에 따라 옮겼습니다. 참고문헌 목록과 인용 번호, 그림 · 표 · 각주 · 수식 · 부록은 빼고 절별로 나누어 실었으며, 그 밖의 문장은 원문 그대로입니다. 원 저작자와 발행 기관은 이 화면을 만들거나 검토하지 않았고, 이곳의 해석과 낱말 풀이는 공식 번역이 아닙니다.