본문 바로가기
읽기 · 학술 · 공개 라이선스 원문

Measuring human capital using global learning data

Noam Angrist, Simeon Djankov, Pinelopi K. Goldberg, Harry A. Patrinos · 2021

164개 나라의 학업 성취를 서로 비교할 수 있게 맞춘 자료(2000~2017년)를 만든 연구입니다. 학교에 다니는 아이는 크게 늘었지만 세계의 학습 수준은 거의 오르지 않았습니다. 나라 사이의 소득 차이 가운데 5분의 1에서 절반이 이 배운 정도로 설명된다고 계산합니다.

출처 Angrist et al. (2021), Nature, 592, 403–408 · 라이선스 CC BY 4.0 · 원문

장 7개 올림 이 장 461낱말
← 앞 장 다음 장 →

이 장은 원문만 있습니다. 문장별 해석은 앞 장부터 차례로 붙입니다.

2장 · Main

The notion of human capital was mentioned as early as in 1776 and formalized two centuries later. Ever since, researchers have explored the role of human capital in economic development. For decades, studies used measures of schooling as a proxy for human capital. This applies even to the most prominent index of human capital to date, the United Nation’s human development index (HDI).

However, using schooling as a proxy for human capital assumes that being in school translates to learning. Evidence suggests that this is often not the case. A recent analysis reveals that six out of ten adolescent individuals worldwide cannot meet basic proficiency levels in mathematics and reading. The gap between schooling and learning is acute in developing countries. In Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, three-quarters of the students in grade 3 cannot read a basic sentence such as ‘the name of the dog is Puppy.’. In rural India, half of the students in grade 3 cannot solve a two-digit subtraction problem (such as 46 – 17).

These data from previous studies demonstrate a substantial gap in the formation of human capital: students are in school, but do not learn enough. Closing this gap is an important priority for economic development. Several studies have suggested that when human capital is measured by schooling, it does not deliver the returns predicted by growth models. However, when measured by learning, human capital is more strongly associated with growth.

To date, much of the effort to measure learning has focused on high-income countries. This limitation is due to the absence of comparable measures of learning in low- and middle-income countries. Existing measures exclude a considerable portion of the global distribution, in particular countries with the most potential to gain from the accumulation of human capital.

In this Article we bridge this gap. We introduce a database of globally comparable learning outcomes for 164 countries covering 98% of the global population from 2000 to 2017. This is one of the largest and most-current global learning databases, one of the first to disaggregate learning results by gender and to introduce methodological improvements such as the inclusion of standard errors to quantify uncertainty around mean scores. The database, referred to as the Harmonized Learning Outcomes (HLO) database, is available for public use and updates are expected every 2 to 3 years as new learning data become available (see ‘Data availability’in Methods). A large-scale effort to track the formation of human capital using this database is the World Bank’s new human capital index.

Of note, throughout this Article, we use the term ‘schooling’ when referring to the average years of schooling or average enrolment rates of a country at specific schooling levels. We use the term ‘learning’ when referring to the stock of basic cognitive skills, including mathematics, reading and science, as measured by standardized tests conducted in school.

이 글은 위 출처의 원문을 그 라이선스(CC BY 4.0)에 따라 옮겼습니다. 참고문헌 목록과 인용 번호, 그림 · 표 · 각주 · 수식 · 부록은 빼고 절별로 나누어 실었으며, 그 밖의 문장은 원문 그대로입니다. 원 저작자와 발행 기관은 이 화면을 만들거나 검토하지 않았고, 이곳의 해석과 낱말 풀이는 공식 번역이 아닙니다.